Sunday, September 20, 2009
ABORTION - Links to Information (INDEX; Watchtower Online Library)
ABORTION (Insight-1 p. 28; Watchtower Online Library)
Abortion (Search Results From the Watchtower Online Library)
Does the Bible Comment on Abortion? (JW.ORG)
Does a substantial health danger justify having an abortion? (Search For Bible Truths)
How does God view unborn children? (Search For Bible Truths)
Does God view the life of a child as precious even during the very early stages of development after conception? (Search For Bible Truths)
Has God ever stated that a person would be called to account for injury to an unborn child? (Search For Bible Truths)
How serious is the willful taking of a human life for a reason not authorized by God? (Search For Bible Truths)
How should the Source of human life affect our view of this matter? (Search For Bible Truths)
Is the option to have an abortion acceptable with God when a woman is pregnant as the result of a rape? (Search For Bible Truths)
"Hypocricy concerning life's value?" ('Reasoning')
Are birth-control pills a form of abortion? (Jehovah's Witnesses Questions and Answers)
Is the option to have an abortion acceptable with God when a woman is pregnant as the result of a rape?
Human life has both a divine origin and a divine purpose. (Gen. 1:27; Job 33:4; Ps. 100:3-5) Throughout the Bible we see reflected God's deep respect for life. He lovingly urged humans to treasure their lives and to respect the lives of others as sacred. Someone who took the life of another human, even a babe in the womb, was both guilty and accountable.—Gen. 9:5, 6; Ex. 21:14, 22-25.
Acts 17:28: "By him [God] we have life and move and exist."
Ps. 36:9: "With you [Jehovah God] is the source of life."
How serious is the willful taking of a human life for a reason not authorized by God?
Gen. 9:6: "Anyone shedding man's blood, by man will his own blood be shed, for in God's image he made man."
1 John 3:15: "No manslayer has everlasting life remaining in him."
Ex. 20:13: "You must not murder."
Has God ever stated that a person would be called to account for injury to an unborn child?
Ex. 21:22, 23: "In case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him without fail according to what the owner of the woman may lay upon him; and he must give it through the justices. But if a fatal accident should occur, then you must give soul for soul." (Some translations make it look as though that in this law to Israel the most important matter was what happened to the mother, not to the fetus. However, the original Hebrew text refers to a fatal accident to either mother or child.)
Does Jehovah view the life of a child as precious even during the very early stages of development after conception?
The Scriptures show that Jehovah takes notice of the life of a child even during the very early stages of development after conception:
Ps. 139:13-16: "You [Jehovah] kept me screened off in the belly of my mother. . . . Your eyes saw even the embryo of me, and in your book all its parts were down in writing."
Friday, September 11, 2009
(Newsweek, Jun 9, 1997)
DOWSING (INDEX; Watchtower Online Library)
W - Witch Water Witching and Other "Paranormal" Powers (Search For Bible Truths)
Has the practice of dowsing been proven to work and is it for Christians? (Search For Bible Truths)
Claim About Moses - The First Dowser? (Search For Bible Truths)
Water Witching and Other "Paranormal" Powers
(Also see the Astrology, the Shroud, and Theomatics study papers)
Of course it's easy and proper for many folks to quickly and positively dismiss water witchers (dowsers, diviners, etc.) who claim supernatural help in performing their `miraculous' work. If you wish to follow the Bible, then you cannot do such things. They would be a form of divination which is strongly condemned in the Bible.
But what about those who use such things and who are convinced that they have merely learned to use natural God-made forces? (Also see the ASTROLOGY study paper.)
They might tell you that this natural force is merely one that science has yet to discover, but that they have somehow managed to learn to use. It is, they might say, no different from an early European explorer amazing the natives by using a magnet to find buried iron or find his way with a mysterious north-pointing needle or using a miraculous glass lens to magnify objects and even start fires!
Well, the difference is that the explorer could have given the magnet or the compass or the lens to anyone and, with very little instruction, it would have worked perfectly every time for him. The forces of nature (including magnetism and light rays, of course) do not work in some mysterious selective fashion anymore than gravity or any other natural force.
If a `force' can be made to work only sporadically (and even then only for a few special individuals), then it is bogus. It must be capable of being proven.
Any test devised to prove the existence of a real force in nature must (1), be capable of being duplicated by anyone who follows the appropriate steps. And (2), it must be devised in such a way that the tester can not possibly manipulate the results (whether intentionally or otherwise).
In the case of the so-called paranormal, the subject will most often claim that since it is some extra-ordinary gift that has been bestowed on him (and not on most other people) that detects and uses the mysterious force in question, we must forgo rule #1 above. This is a very strong indicator for quackery. Nevertheless, we should be able to plan and execute rule #2 carefully and precisely enough to prevent the results being tainted by self-deception or outright quackery.
The method James Randi used in his test of "water witching" sets a high standard for this sort of thing. If there is any truth to the claims of water witchers that they can find buried objects, water, or anything else, this should prove (or disprove) it!
First, he offered a legitimate prize of $10,000 to anyone who might pass his test in any of a number of categories, including water-witching. Then he outlined exactly what each test would entail and what results were required as proof. Not only would those who passed his test receive the $10,000, but they would receive the endorsement of Randi and his organization (which would mean much more than the $10,000 in promotion for the person's business!).
The dowsing (water-witching) test was written out as follows:
1. In a 10-by-10-meter area, pipes 3 centimeters in diameter have been buried at a depth of 50 centimeters.
2. There are three different paths of three different lengths available, one to be chosen at random for each test.
3. Three tests will be performed with each person, and the same path may be used more than once, since the choice is random.
4. The chosen path may enter at any point on any side of the square and exit at any point on any side of the square.
5. First, the dowser must scan the area for any natural water or other distractions (metal or other objects) and mark these `natural' places.
6. Any secondary distractions will be outlined on the ground visibly.
7. Second, the dowser must demonstrate, on an exposed water pipe, while the water is running, that the dowsing reaction is present.
8. The dowser will determine the path of the flowing water in the pipe being used, and this path will be marked on the ground.
9. The dowser will place from ten to one hundred pegs in the ground along the path he traces.
10. To be counted, a peg must be placed within 10 centimeters [nearly 4 inches] of the center of the pipe being traced.
11. Two thirds of the pegs put in the ground in each of the three tests for each dowser must be placed within the limits specified by condition 10 for the test to be considered a success.
12. Placement of each peg will be transferred to a scale chart by the surveyor to the satisfaction of the dowser, who will sign this chart along with Mr. Randi, the lawyer, and other witnesses.
13. No results will be announced until all tests are finished and the location of the pipes is revealed.
14. After a dowser has performed, he will be isolated from those yet to be tested.
15. Two out of three of the tests must be successful (as in condition 11) for the dowser to have passed the testing condition.
16. If a dowser passes the test (conditions 11 and 15), the check for $10,000, which has been deposited with the lawyer, will be awarded to him. If no dowser is successful, the check will be returned to Mr. Randi.
17. If the test is failed, no further claim may be made against Mr. Randi.
Of course, efforts were made to ensure that the very few individuals who knew the layout of the pipe system were unable to communicate this knowledge to anyone else until the tests were completed. It would also have been proper technique to keep them away from the site during each test so that they couldn't possibly give any clue, even inadvertently.
Only four established dowsers were brave enough to make the attempt in a 1979 test in Italy. I expect they honestly believed they had the ability that others swore they had. They seemed supremely confident.
I have heard of some dowsers who claim 100-percent success in their attempts to find water and of others who claim only 90 percent. The sad fact is that dowsers are no better at finding water than anyone else. Drill a well almost anywhere in an area where water is geologically possible, and you will find it. Dowsers have the strange notion that water travels in underground rivers, and they will happily trace these hidden torrents for you. But geologists know otherwise. - p. 315.
All four failed completely and spectacularly!
As Mr. Randi concluded:
All the dowsers who were tested had failed. The two who "found" natural water disagreed spectacularly [about its location], and those who found no water disagreed too. All had positive dowsing reactions and were certain they were correct, but actually they had detected nothing at all. All had considerable reputations as successful dowsers, yet all asserted that this was the first time they had undergone a test that was controlled and could be checked thoroughly for correctness! Only a method similar to the one I designed could settle the matter once and for all. Their first and only proper tests had proved the subjects did not have the ability to dowse. Yet I am quite sure that these people still claim they are dowsers. Incredible? Yes, but typical. - p. 324.
Mr. Randi has kept his $10,000 offer, first offered in 1964, open to all who will submit to a fair, objective test. Over 650 persons had applied in various `paranormal' categories at the time his book was first published (1982). Not one ever passed a proper, objective test. [I believe that the offer is now $1,000,000 - Jan 2007 - RDB]
Jehovah's Witnesses have written about this subject also:
From the AWAKE! magazine:
Dowsing - Scientific or Occult?
"AMAZING!" exclaimed a dairy farmer in the Midwestern United States. A slender peach limb was jerking and twisting violently in his hands. He dug his fingernails into the bark to hold the branch steady, but the downward force was strong. "It even left pieces of bark in my hands," he gasped, awestruck. He was still more amazed later when he found water by digging in the exact spot that the limb had pointed out. What was going on here?
The farmer was practicing what is often called dowsing, water witching, or water divining. Often, the dowser holds a forked branch in his hands and paces about, concentrating on his search for water. Suddenly, his dowsing rod may behave erratically. Some rods jerk toward the ground, others snap upward, even striking the dowser's face or chest, while still others just barely move. In any such case, the dowser feels that there is water below. Dowsing is practiced around the world. According to one estimate, some 25,000 dowsers ply their trade in the United States alone.
Is It Scientific?
Is there some scientific principle that makes dowsing work? The question has long been controversial. Over 70 years ago, the Watchtower magazine reasoned this way: "We would not wish to be in an attitude of disregarding any of nature's laws, but it seems passing strange that a small trickle of water fifteen or twenty feet [5 or 6 m] below the surface of the earth would have magnetic power enough to bend a willow withe when a whole creek full of water will in no wise affect the same stick.... There must therefore be something other than the operation of natural laws."
Still, many dowsers insist that dowsing is a science. In fact, The American Society of Dowsers calls itself "a non-profit, educational and scientific Society." Over the years, more than a few scientists have emerged to call upon some new branch of science to explain dowsing. In the 1700's it was "emanations" from atomic particles that made dowsing work. In the 1800's it was electricity. In our century it has been everything from radioactivity to electromagnetism to human psychology.
More recently, in 1979, the reputable New Scientist magazine published seemingly plausible theories on dowsing. An energy consultant and a geologist speculated that the human body itself might be supersensitive to subtle changes in electric, magnetic, or electromagnetic fields caused by underground water or ore.
But such theories have failed to win wide acceptance among scientists. In fact, in The Encyclopedia Americana, Harvard University scientists E. Z. Vogt and L. K. Barrett dismiss dowsing this way: "Controlled field and laboratory tests have failed to establish the validity of dowsing, and judged by scientific standards the practice has little basis in fact." In November 1990, dowsers submitted to 720 experiments in Kassel, Germany. Although they were pleased with the conditions of the tests and were confident of success, the dowsers failed; they had only fluky successes in detecting underground water and metals. The monthly magazine Naturwissenschaftliche Rundschau concluded that when judged scientifically, dowsing is "as reliable as flipping a coin." Other such experiments have ended similarly.
Dowsers explain such failures in strange terms. Some complain, for instance, that the tests make them doubt their abilities or lead them to dowse for motives that are not right or serious enough. Such factors, they claim, make them lose their powers temporarily. In fact, a number of dowsers have found that after a lifetime of successful dowsing, it is the one time when they really need to prove themselves that their powers suddenly vanish - or mislead them. Some therefore conclude that the force behind dowsing has a perverse sense of humor.
Does this sound like science to you? After all, natural forces (those measurable by methods known to science) do not have a sense of humor, perverse or otherwise; nor are they whimsical. They are constant. They do not fluctuate according to the mood, mind-set, or motives of those who test or measure them. Thus, to most scientists dowsing is a superstition - nothing more. In fact, even prominent dowsers have agreed that no force known to science can account for dowsing.
Is It Fake?
But does this absence of a scientific explanation mean that all reported cases of successful dowsing are either remarkable coincidences or outright fakes? What about the farmer's experience mentioned at the outset - was it just a fluke, an isolated case?
Actually, the field of dowsing has produced innumerable well-attested stories. For instance, a woman in Vermont called a dowser when the water supply to her house was cut off. Apparently a long pipe running from a distant spring to the house had developed a leak. The woman did not even know where the pipe was - it had been buried 30 years previously - let alone where the cracked section might be. But the dowser mentally asked his rod, and it bobbed over a certain spot. Six inches [15 cm] from there, the leaking piece of pipe was found.
Probably the most famous story concerns the noted American dowser Henry Gross. Geologists were convinced that fresh water could not be found underground in Bermuda. The Saturday Evening Post reported: "Gross spread out a map of Bermuda in [novelist Kenneth] Roberts's home in Kennebunkport, Maine, and passing his divining rod over it, marked three places where fresh water was to be found . . . To check his findings, Gross and Roberts flew to Bermuda, persuaded the government to provide drilling equipment, and went to work. A few months later, in April 1950, all three wells had come in as Gross had said they would."
Dowsers claim to have found water for wells by the thousands. Reporters have accompanied dowsers, have seen the rods jerk so violently that the dowser's hands blistered, and have heard dowsers predict even the depth of the water below. They have seen the wells drilled and the predictions verified. While science may not supply viable reasons why this phenomenon works, it clearly does work - at least for some people, sometimes. Why?
A Revealing History
The history of dowsing is quite revealing in this regard. The practice may well have been around for thousands of years. But it was in 1556, when physician Georgius Agricola wrote his landmark work on mining, De Re Metallica, that the first detailed description of dowsing was recorded. German miners were using the practice to find veins of metal ore. But even then there was controversy over whether dowsing was a natural or an occult phenomenon. Agricola noted that some objected to the practice, since "the twigs [dowsing rods] will not move for everybody, but only for those who employ incantations and craft." As dowsing spread across Europe, the controversy spread with it. Martin Luther condemned it, and other church leaders later followed suit. To appease such clergymen, some dowsers had their rods baptized, and they invoked their Trinitarian God when dowsing.
For many dowsers, looking for water and mineral deposits was not enough. They found more and more uses for the rod. In 17th-century France, Jacques Aymar began dowsing to find criminals! Reportedly, he was dowsing for water one day when his rod jerked violently at the grave of a murdered woman. The rod then lurched toward the woman's husband, who promptly fled. Aymar - and many imitators - used the dowsing rod to flush out criminals all over Europe. Catholic zealots even enlisted Aymar and his dowsing rod to help them hunt down Protestants to slaughter.
The Occult Connection
Not surprisingly, even in Aymar's day there were "experts" who thought they could explain such feats scientifically. They theorized that Aymar's dowsing rod was picking up mysterious "emanations" unique to murderers, which they dubbed "murderous matter." Clearly, though, Aymar's feats had little to do with science. The force behind what Aymar did was intelligent. It could pick out criminals, differentiate between Protestant and Catholic, and find water and minerals as well.
Similarly, how could anything but an intelligent force be behind map dowsing, where the rod points out water sources on a mere map of a distant location? Some dowsers have found lost wallets, passports, jewelry, and even people by dowsing with a pendulum over a map. Some watch for the dowsing instrument's response to yes or no questions. In the 1960's some U.S. Marines used dowsing rods to locate tunnels, land mines, and booby traps in Vietnam. Today, the dowsing rod is increasingly popular as a tool of the paranormal. It is used to predict the future, to look for `ghosts,' and to investigate `past lives.'
Author Ben G. Hester was originally convinced that dowsing was simply a "not-yet-understood physical phenomenon." But after eight years of investigating the subject, he wrote the book Dowsing-an Exposé of Hidden Occult Forces. In it he equates the dowsing rod with such devices as Ouija boards. He found that some dowsers claim the ability to heal people - or make them sick - with a dowsing rod! Similarly, dowser Robert H. Leftwich wrote in his book Dowsing-The Ancient Art of Rhabdomancy: "The energies being tapped probably belong to powers that . . . are closely allied to those practised in witchcraft. Careless experimentation can therefore be dangerous."
To true Christians, the foregoing has an unpleasant ring to it. Whether real or fake, dowsing in such cases as noted above is clearly not science; it seems to be the occult. As scientists Evon Z. Vogt and Ray Hyman summed up in Water Witching U.S.A.: "We therefore conclude that water witching is a clear-cut case of magical divination."
Should a Christian Dabble in Dowsing?
Of course, if dowsing is really an act of divination, a true Christian would want nothing to do with it. God's people were commanded, as we read in the Bible at Deuteronomy 18:10: "There should not be found in you . . . anyone who employs divination, a practicer of magic or anyone who looks for omens or a sorcerer." The prophet Hosea bemoaned the Israelites' failure to heed this command, writing: "My people consult their block of wood, a rod answers their questions." - Hosea 4:12, The Jerusalem Bible.
Some might object, though, that they only indulge in the simplest form of dowsing: locating water. But is water dowsing clean of all association with the occult? It is interesting to note that dowsing instructors commonly teach students to tell the rod directly what they are looking for, as if it were an intelligent entity. One dowsing instructor even tells his students to name the rod and address it by name! Dowsers often ask their dowsing rods how far down the water source lies. The rod begins to bob, and the dowser counts the number of times it does so. The final tally equals the depth, in feet [meters], of the water source! Does this not suggest that a hidden intelligence is at work?
Furthermore, water dowsing is associated with another practice that Jehovah's Witnesses have long been careful to avoid - ESP (extrasensory perception). The Watchtower noted that connection back in 1962. Shortly thereafter, the American Society of Dowsers responded with a letter: "We agree with the theory that dowsing is a form of ESP and that engaging in any form of ESP can lead to `possession' or the involvement with `wicked spirit forces' unless proper precautions are taken. We must take exception, however, to your dogmatic advice of total abstinence."
What do you think? If even the most ardent proponents of water dowsing admit that it carries a risk of involvement with wicked spirit forces or even of possession, should not a Christian want to abstain from such a practice?
`But doesn't dowsing do a lot of good?' some might ask. `Is that not proof that the force behind dowsing is benevolent?' Sadly, no. Remember, "Satan himself keeps transforming himself into an angel of light." (2 Corinthians 11:14) Even in Bible times demons occasionally tried to gain favor and influence by uttering truths. - Acts 16:16-18.
Granted, we cannot assert dogmatically that each and every case of dowsing (and ESP as well) is scientifically unexplainable and must be caused by demons. Without a doubt, there is much about the human mind and the forces of nature that still eludes the grasp of science. And no doubt there are a great many dowsing and ESP feats that can be explained away as plain, old-fashioned fakery. But since the history and current practice of dowsing is so inextricably intertwined with the occult, ESP, and spiritism, it is clearly too dangerous to be dismissed as a harmless trick.
No, when it comes to dowsing, "quit touching the unclean thing" still seems appropriate counsel. - 2 Corinthians 6:17. - pp. 12-16, Awake!, 22 April 1992.
1. There are many more people who are deluded (sometimes self-deluded) into belief in the non-existent than there are intentional hucksters. James Randi, noted hoax-buster, writes:
"Possession of a `high IQ' often has little to do with one's ability to function as a rational human being. It merely means that some admittedly imperfect tests indicate one has a better-than-average potential for good thinking. Like a scalpel that is never put to use by a skilled hand in a good cause, brainpower is often not put to work. .... So, if you have in the past fallen for the hucksters of [the paranormal], and if you are embarrassed by it all, take hope. The smartest folks in the world are no smarter than you are when it comes to belief in the ridiculous." - pp. 210-211, Flim-Flam!
It should be added that critical thinking can be learned by anyone of average intelligence. And critical thinking (how to reason and sift out all the distractions and irrelevancies to a proper investigation of the truth) is much more important than "intelligence"! We have all fallen into the trap. Sometimes we get out. Sometimes we stay in it until we die. If something is truly important to us, we must learn to investigate it properly!
2. Flim-Flam!, Prometheus Books, 1987 printing.
3. One such theory was reported on in the June 22, 1979, issue of Awake! In 1989 an extensive report on dowsing in The New Yorker magazine noted that today even the more conservative of American dowsers agree (tacitly) that ESP is the force behind dowsing.